E-mail ID : info@iamg.in
 
 
 
 

Online Submission

Click Here For Online Submission
Instructions for authors

Genetic Clinics

Editorial board

Get Our Newsletter

Subscribe

Send Your Feedback

Feedback Form

About Us

IAMG

Clinical Vignette

Evolution of Diagnosis with Evolving Technology: A Story of 10q Duplication Syndrome

Priyanka Srivastava, Aradhana Dwivedi, Shubha R Phadke
Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence to: Dr Shubha R Phadke      Email: shubharaophadke@gmail.com

1 Abstract

Complete or partial trisomy 10q involves a duplication of the long arm of chromosome 10. Distal 10q trisomy is a well-recognized but rare genetic syndrome in which duplication of distal segments of 10q results in a pattern of malformations. Molecular cytogenetic techniques are advantageous not only in identifying submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances, but also in identifying the exact origin of the extra chromosomal material. Many a times, the phenotype of patients also evolves with age. We report a 17-year-old boy, suspected to have Trisomy 21 during infancy, but who on re-evaluation and follow up, was identified by cytogenetic microarray (CMA) to have partial 10q duplication. In this short report, we discuss the overlapping features of 10q duplication with trisomy 21 and utility of CMA in evaluation of chromosomal imbalances.

2 Introduction

Duplication of 10q was first reported by Klep-de Pater et al. (1979) as a recognizable syndrome. It is characterized by a high and large forehead, round and flat face with flat nasal bridge, epicanthic folds, hypertelorism, fine eyebrows, antimongoloid slant of eyes, low-set ears, cleft palate, micrognathia, short nose, bow-shaped mouth, microcephaly, hypotonia, joint laxity, clinodactyly, scoliosis, short neck, growth retardation, psychomotor disorders, and cardiac, ocular and renal abnormalities (Roux et al., 1974; Berger et al., 1976; Tomkins et al., 1983; Klep-de Pater et al., 1979; Davies et al., 1998). The evidence for a distal 10q duplication syndrome is limited by the fact that out of well over 50 cases reported, no more than a handful have only 10q duplication without involvement of any other chromosome arm (Sarri et al., 2011; Carter et al., 2010; Xiao et al., 2012). With the advent of molecular cytogenetic techniques, it is possible to better delineate the region involved in the 10q duplication and also to detect other co-existing chromosomal imbalances.

Here we report a 17-years-old propositus with dysmorphic features and developmental delay with 10q duplication.

3 Case report

A 17-year-old boy, born to healthy and non-consanguineous parents was first evaluated at 14 days of life for dysmorphic features. His facial features at that time were suggestive of Down syndrome and a karyotype was performed, which showed extra material on the q arm of chromosome 10 (Figure 1). Due to phenotypic resemblance to Down syndrome, a diagnosis of trisomy 21 was given and it was concluded that the extra material on chromosome 10q was a translocated long arm of chromosome 21 (21q). Parents’ karyotypes were normal. The family was accordingly counseled and thereafter the child was lost to follow up.

PIC

 Figure 1: Partial karyotype of the patient showing extra material at the end of q arm of chromosome 10 (10q+).

He was brought to the Genetics OPD again, after 17 years, for evaluation of global developmental delay, delayed puberty and facial dysmorphism. On examination his height was 172 cm (+1.5 to +2 SD), weight was 75 kg (+1.5 to +2 SD) and head circumference was 53.5cm (-2 SD). He had an oval, flat face with a protruding thick lower lip, mid face hypoplasia, short nose, a short neck, low posterior hair line, small ears, micropenis and delayed puberty (SMR stage 2) and this time his facial features were not suggestive of Down syndrome (Figure 2). He had bilateral simian crease and difficulty in squatting. He did not have ptosis but had puffy upper eyelids bilaterally. He was found to have slipped epiphyses of head of femur. There was no history of seizures, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiac symptoms or frequent infections. He was studying in the 9th standard and had learning difficulties. Formal evaluation showed IQ to be 65 (by Malin’s intelligence scale for Indian children). Cytogenetic microarray was performed to ascertain the origin of extra material on chromosome 10.

PIC

 Figure 2: Clinical photograph of the patient showing oval face, midface hypoplasia, short nose, short neck, low posterior hair line and protruding thick lower lip.

Cytogenetic Microarray done using Affymetrix CytoScan750K Array revealed a 23.5Mb duplication of 10q25.1 (arr[hg19] 10q25.1q26.3(109,292,821-132,860,709)x3) and a terminal 2.5Mb deletion of 10q26.3 (arr[hg19] 10q26.3(132,861,927-135,426,386)x1) (Figure 3).

PIC

 Figure 3: Cytogenetic microarray showing 23.5Mb duplication (blue colour) on 10q25.1-26.3 and 2.5Mb deletion (red colour) on 10q26.3 along with the whole genomic view (bottom).

4 Discussion

This case illustrates the utility of CMA in delineating imbalances detected by traditional karyotyping. The case also stresses the need to re-evaluate patients with undiagnosed dysmorphic syndromes using newer diagnostic tests. Table 1 summarizes clinical features of cases with duplication of terminal part of q arm of chromosome 10. Majority of the reported cases have occurred in association with partial monosomy of other chromosomes, complicating the delineation of clinical features.


 Table  1: Comparison of the clinical features of the present patient with those of other previously reported patients.











Devriendt et al. (1999)

Hou (2003)

Migliori et al. (2002)

Petek et al. (2001)

Al-Sarraj et al. 2014

Wong et al. 2015

Carter et al. 2010

Sarri et al. 2011

Xiao et al. 2012

Present study












Cytogenetic technique

FISH

FISH

FISH

FISH

CMA

CMA

CMA

CMA

CMA

CMA












Segment











Duplication

10q26-qter

10q26.1-qter

10q25.3-qter

10q24.33-qter

10q24.31-10qter

10q23.1-10q25.1

10q25.1-26.3

10q26.11-q26.2

10q25.3-26.2

10q25.1-26.3












Deletion

-

-

-

-

-

-

10q26.3-qter

10q26.22-q26.3

10q26.2-26.3

10q26.3












Development











Mental retardation/ Developmental delay

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+












Short stature

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

-

-












Facial dysmorphisms











Blepharophimosis

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

+

-












Hypertelorism/ epicanthus

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-












Ptosis

-

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-












Low-set/ malformed ears

-

-

+

+

-

-

+

-

+

+












Strabismus

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

+

-












Short neck

-

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

+

+












Long philtrum

-

+

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-












Skeletal anomalies











Camptodactyly/ sandal gap

+

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-












Lordosis/scoliosis

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

-

-

-












Hypermobility

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

-

-












Hip dysplasia

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

-

-

+












Hypotonia

+

-

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

-












Others

-

Hearing loss; ventricular septal defect

-

-

Facial asymmetry, marfanoid habitus, autism

Left-sided inguinal hernia, cardiac, renal, ocular and brain abnormalities, autism

Hearing loss

Behavioral anomalies

-

Bilateral simian crease, difficulty in squatting, delayed puberty, Down syndrome like features in early infancy












(‘+’ and ‘-’ symbols denote presence and absence respectively)

Our literature search yielded nine case reports with sufficient clinical data to attempt a comparison of features by size of duplicated segment (Figure 4 and Table 1). The comparison is limited by the resolution of the breakpoint mapping in older reports, as only few of them were subjected to microarray analysis. Four cases were evaluated by traditional karyotyping and FISH and five were evaluated by CMA. Only three cases are reported where duplication of 10q is associated with deletion (Sarri et al 2011, Carter et al 2011, Xiao et al 2012). In our study, the patient had a de novo duplication of 10q25.1–q26.3 spanning 23.5Mb, arr[hg19] 10q25.1q26.3(109,292,821-132,860,709)x3 which contains approximately 84 known genes, as well as a 2.5Mb deletion of the terminal end of 10q26.3arr[hg19] 10q26.3(132,861,927-135,426,386)x1 including 16 OMIM genes.

PIC

 Figure 4: The affected region of 10q in present case and its comparison with other reported patients.

Though the patient was clinically suspected to have Down syndrome in the neonatal period, on re-evaluation at 17 years of age his phenotype had evolved clearly and did not match the Down syndrome phenotype. Oval face, small nose, midface hypoplasia, protruding and thick lower lip, low posterior hair line and puffy eyelids were the conspicuous features of this patient. Similar facial phenotype has been described in other reports (Migliori et al., 2002; Al-Saraj et al., 2014). All the reported cases had a variable degree of intellectual disability; the reported patient had moderate intellectual disability. Most of the reported cases had blepharophimosis and ptosis, hypotonia, hypermobility, mild hand and foot anomalies, and absence of major congenital anomalies (Miglior et al., 2002; Carter et al., 2010). The smallest involved region was from 10q26.2-qter (Devriendt et al., 1999), suggesting that a dosage-sensitive locus responsible for blepharophimosis in these individuals resides within band 10q26.2 or 10q26.3. Two of the reported cases had conductive hearing loss (Hou et al., 2003; Carter et al., 2010) and two had autism (Al-Saraj et al., 2014, Wong et al., 2015). Phenotypic features of cases of 10q duplication (only) and cases with duplication followed by terminal deletion of 10q are given in Table 1. Blepharophimosis had once been considered as a characteristic feature for 10q duplication but it is not present in all the cases including the present case. Additional frequent features of 10q duplication are skeletal anomalies, which include camptodactyly, sandal gap, scoliosis or hypermobility as listed in Table 1. Our patient had no obviously abnormal skeletal feature but on radiological evaluation was found to have slipped epiphyses of head of the femur.

This case report clearly reinforces the fact that it is important to review patients with dysmorphic syndromes and keep them under regular follow-up, as both the clinical phenotype and diagnostic technologies evolve with time.

5 Acknowledgement

We sincerely thank the cooperation of the patient and his family and acknowledge Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi for funding (BMS- 63/8/2010).

References

1.    Al-Sarraj Y, et al. Distal trisomy 10q syndrome, report of a patient with duplicated q24.31 - qter, autism spectrum disorder and unusual features. Clin Case Rep 2014; 2: 201-205.

2.    Berger R, et al. Partial “de novo” trisomy 10q. J Genet Hum 1976; 24: 261-269.

3.    Carter MT, et al. Distal trisomy 10q syndrome: phenotypic features in a child with inverted duplicated 10q25.1-q26.3. Clin Dysmorphol 2010;19(3):140-145.

4.    Courtens W, et al. A subterminal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 10: a clinical report and review. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140: 402-409.

5.    Devriendt K, et al. Triplication of distal chromosome 10q. J Med Genet 1999; 36:242-245.

6.    Hou JW. Chromosomal 10q26 trisomy resulting from paternal t(9;10) (pter;q26.1). J Formos Med Assoc 2003; 102:887-892.

7.    Klep-de Pater JM, et al. Partial trisomy 10q: a recognizable syndrome. Hum Genet 1979; 46:29-40.

8.    Migliori MV, et al. Distal trisomy of 10q: report of a new case of duplication 10q25.2-25.3-qter defined by FISH. Ann Genet 2002; 45:9-12.

9.    Petek E, et al. Molecular cytogenetics and phenotype characterization of a de novo pure partial trisomy 10(q24.33-qter). Clin Dysmorph. 2001;10:151-153.

10.    Roux C, et al. Partial trisomy 10q dueto familial translocation t(10q-; 22p-plus). Ann Genet 1974; 17:59-62.

11.    Sarri C, et al. Complex distal 10q rearrangement in a girl with mild intellectual disability: follow up of the patient and review of the literature of non-acrocentric satellited chromosomes. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A: 2841-2854.

12.    Tomkins DJ, et al. Confirmation of a de novo duplication, dup(10)(q24 leads to q26), by GOT1 gene dosage studies. Hum Genet 1983; 63: 369-373.

13.    Wong SL, et al. Distal 10q trisomy with copy number gain in chromosome region 10q23.1-10q25.1: the Wnt signaling pathway is the most pertinent to the gene content in the region of copy number gain: a case report. BMC Res Notes 2015; 8:250.

14.    Xiao B, et al. Inverted Duplication and Deletion of 10q25q26 in a Patient without Any Obvious Skeletal Anomalies. Mol Syndromol 2012; 3:185-189.

Abstract   Download PDF