Divya Pachat 1, Krati Shah 1, Wim Van Hul 2, Thambu David 3and Sumita Danda 1 1Department of Clinical Genetics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India 2Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, 2650 Edegem, Belgium 3Department of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India Correspondence to: Dr Sumita Danda, Email:sdanda@cmcvellore.ac.in
1 Abstract
Among the genetic causes of osteosclerosis, Camurati-Engelmann disease is a rare entity. Bhadada et al. have recently
reported the first Indian family with genetic confirmation of Camurati- Engelmann Disease (CED) (Bhadada et al., 2014).
Here we describe another case of CED with molecular confirmation.
2 Case Report
A 33-years-old lady presented with gradually progressive pain over both lower limbs since 7 years of age.
She had mild headache and gave a history of delayed puberty. There was no significant family history.
She was on multiple non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications without much relief for her symptoms.
Positive examination findings included proptosis (Figure 1), a waddling gait and mixed hearing loss in the
right ear. Her hemoglobin level was 10.9g% (11-15gm/dl in females), alkaline phosphatase was 240 IU/L
(40-125 IU/L) and CPK was 51mg/dl (<145 mg/dl in females). Radiographs revealed bilateral symmetrical
hyperostosis of the diaphyses of long bones (Figure 2) with involvement of the skull (Figure 3a & 3b). There
was intense tracer activity observed in the skull and long bones in the PET scan. Based on the clinical,
radiological and PET scan findings, a diagnosis of Camurati Engelmann was suspected and the mutation
analysis was attempted by direct sequencing of all the TGFβ1 encoding exons which showed a known
heterozygous mutation (c.652C>T; p.Arg218Cys) in exon 4, confirming the clinical diagnosis at the molecular
level. The patient was started on glucocorticoids and showed significant response symptomatically. Genetic
analysis was performed for other available members of her family, including her mother and 5 siblings and
none of them were found to harbour the mutation. As her father had expired in a road traffic accident,
his genotype could not be ascertained, but there was no history suggestive of any bone disorders in him.
Figure 1: Proptosis seen in the patient.
Figure 2: Radiograph shows cortical thickening and hyperostosis of both femora.
a)
b)
Figure 3: a&b) Sclerosis of skull is evident in radiographs.
3 Discussion
CED is a rare autosomal dominant condition, belonging to the group of craniotubular hyperostoses. The hallmark of this
disorder is the cortical thickening of the diaphyses of the long bones. Exophthalmos has been reported by Jiajue et al. as
the presenting feature in a milder form of CED (Jiajue et al., 2016). Though our patient never complained of eye
problems, proptosis was evident on clinical examination. Generally, CED is caused by mutations in the Transforming
Growth Factor β (TGFβ1) gene, functionally leading to an increased activity of TGFβ1 which then disturbs both the
osteoclastic resorption and osteoblastic bone formation (Janssens et al., 2006). Majority of the mutations detected in CED
are missense mutations in exon 4 and arginine residue at position 218 is considered as a mutation hotspot,
accounting for 60% of the mutations (Janssens et al., 2006). Probably Indian kindreds also harbour the same
hotspot as evidenced by the present case report and the studies of Bhadada et al. (2014). De novo mutations
are not reported so far in CED. Apparent de novo mutations should be considered for non- paternity or
maternity (e.g., with assisted reproduction) or undisclosed adoption could also be explored (Wallace &
Wilcox, 2015). The proband was the only affected member for our family. The mother and siblings were
negative for mutation. However chances of inheritance of the disease from the paternal side could not be ruled
out.
Several investigators have described success with corticosteroids in the treatment of CED, in reducing pain and
weakness, improving gait, exercise intolerance and correcting anemia (Naveh et al., 1985; Heymans et al., 1998). As our
patient also had an improvement in clinical symptoms following prednisolone, we support the literature recommending
short term glucocorticoids in the management of CED.
Ours is another Indian case of CED with confirmed molecular diagnosis with a missense mutation in the
previously described common position denoting this to be a hotspot region in Indian families similar to other
ethnic groups. Molecular testing for this hotspot could be easily offered on a diagnostic basis for young
individuals presenting with non specific limb pain and waddling gait for diagnosing CED. This will help
to avoid unnecessary evaluation and start steroids to provide symptomatic relief for the patient at the
earliest.
References
1. Bhadada SK, et al. Camurati–Engelmann Disease (Progressive Diaphyseal Dysplasia): Reports of an Indian
Kindred. Calcif Tissue Int 2014; 94: 240-247.
2. Heymans O, et al. Camurati–Engelmann disease: effects of corticosteroids. Acta Clin Belg 1998; 53: 189-192.
3. Janssens K, et al. Camurati–Engelmann disease: review of the clinical, radiological, and molecular data of
24 families and implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Med Genet 2006; 43:1-11.
4. Jiajue R, et al. Mild Camurati Engelmann disease presenting with exophthalmos as the first and only
manifestation: A case report. Mol Med Rep 2016; 14: 2710-2716.
5. Naveh Y, et al. Progressive diaphyseal dysplasia: evaluation of corticosteroid therapy. Pediatrics 1985;
75:321-323.
6. Wallace SE, Wilcox WR. Camurati-Engelmann Disease. 2004 Jun 25 [Updated 2015 Mar 5]. In: Pagon RA,
et al., Editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2017. Available
from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1156/; accessed on 26/8/2017.